41 sats \ 7 replies \ @k00b OP 16h \ parent \ on: SN elects to go noncustodial on Nov. 5th - FAQ & AMA
Yes, we cannot custody money for other people without KYCing them. I'd rather kill myself making noncustodial stuff work well than require stackers to KYC.
write
preview
14 sats \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 7h
Yes understand, and I hope it can work. They will try everything to stop us having the freedom to choose an alternative to their parasitic fiat monopoly. We just have to fight back constructively and you are doing a great job of that.
reply
10 sats \ 5 replies \ @0371279ce5 7h
Could you move SN HQ to a more favorable jurisdiction so you don't have to do that?
reply
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @ek 7h
It doesn’t matter where HQ is, it matters where your customers are
reply
10 sats \ 3 replies \ @0371279ce5 7h
That's a bit confusing. So the US could theoretically come after a non-US company because US customers are using their service?
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 6h
Yes, because they are providing service to US customers
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b OP 7h
Yes.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 5h
Global fiat hegemony - don't you love it? Bitcoin ~ will ~ fix ~ this ~ one ~ day?
reply