168 sats \ 1 reply \ @SimpleStacker 20 Oct \ on: Sending 1 sat Is Inefficient, Let's Send Them to Rewards Instead! meta
How does directing it to reward solve the efficiency problem? Won’t it still be a LN transaction after all?
Remember, the SN has to take a cut and then divide what's left, which isn't much to begin with. If we send to rewards, we can skip that step. Plus, rewards stay within the SN LN node, so it's probably easier. But hey, I'm no LN guru, this might be a totally dumb idea!
reply