pull down to refresh
11 sats \ 53 replies \ @didiplaywell 24 Oct \ on: Do you believe humans can have psychic abilities? spirituality
I don't. And I severely dislike the idea. Why would you even want this? Anything that's claimed possible with all of that is routinely achieved by actual science, over and over, the ultimate example being Neuralink. The great hypocrisy from this kind of subjects is that they systematically prevent you from achieving anything, while you could have done not the same but incomparably more through actual science. Think about this and you will find it's always true.
I feel quite differently and I appreciate your perspective. To me, Science is just one way of viewing reality. It isn't what is absolute and "real". This is coming from someone who used run on "logic" and only believe in science. Then I went through some kind of major shift. And now I see my reality In a whole new way. I now longer observe an objective. We are born with the ability to tap into all types of things if we learn how to harness it. Its all energy and vibration, and we can tap into the fields with our own human bodies. I hope people are cautious when putting chips in your brain, especially ones that were created by another human who is in the business of who knows what. That seems dangerous to me. I would much prefer to use my own natural abilities. I am curious why you almost seem offended by the question. To "severely dislike" the idea. This is all just my opinion, based on my own experience. And in my experience, magic is real. 🤷♂️
reply
Science is just one way of viewing reality.
Science do not claims any differently. Even within itself.
It isn't what is absolute and "real".
It's never about "absolute" and "real". Science claims that to understand existence you must abandon notions as "absolute". Knowledge is and can only be contextual and referential.
I would much prefer to use my own natural abilities.
From the second you sit on a bike, you stop relying on your natural abilities. We all are as much as our technology allows us to be.
I am curious why you almost seem offended by the question. To "severely dislike" the idea.
I'm not offended, this is my perspective. My severe dislike is because not only this subjects do not allow to do what they claim to, but they even prevent you from achieving it, and even prevent you from being closer to nature and to be more able to appreciate its brightness and beauty. It's a no-no from every angle, hence my strong dislike.
reply
I invented the bike.
reply
I know.
reply
Seems you are right. So I won't convince you otherwise. I don't know anything, like I said.
reply
Have you never had a thought the same time as another? Or heard about a mother knowing their child was in danger from another state? It definitely happens. I am sure there is way to measure it with science. The government is even tapped in. Check out the video @OneOneSeven posted. Do you think that is real? I only ask to encourage you to open your mind and consider there is more happening here than meets the eye.
reply
Have you never had a thought the same time as another? Or heard about a mother knowing their child was in danger from another state? It definitely happens.
Yes, all the time. It's called intuition, an almost unavoidable ability of the brain to infer.
I am sure there is way to measure it with science.
There's, inference capability is measurable through correlativity coefficients from pattern recognition.
Do you think that is real?
What specifically? (sorry, inference failure :P )
consider there is more happening here than meets the eye.
That's a mantra I live by, that's why I love science. Science is all about always believing that there's more than what simply meets the eye.
reply
"A scientist may grow into a mystic. Never will a mystic grow into a scientist. "
-a guy at a bus stop
reply
That's not only factually untrue but examples are even famous for the scientifical breakthroughs produced after the awakenings from the mystical lethargy. One of the most important, of the top of my head, was Johannes Kepler (initially a devote mysticist, ditched the whole thing and embraced science, resulting in modern era celestial science).
There's also me. I was not only a devote Christian, but I also believed in all of this things as if they were certain. Until I woke up.
reply
I have never met Mr. Kepler, so I am not sure how that proves what is "factually untrue". And Christianity is not the same as swimming with the mystics in my view. My whole point is that nothing is certain. So we should be i agreement right? But you just said that what I said was untrue. Which means you are certain. What woke you up?
reply
so I am not sure how that proves what is "factually untrue"
As per his own account on how he transitioned. Read his story, it's worth it.
Christianity is not the same as swimming with the mystics in my view
But he did however, for his initial views were inspired by religion, though dwelled in mysticism for nothing it had to do with his religion. That connection is what he was looking for and he failed, causing him to snap back to reality.
My whole point is that nothing is certain.
We agree, but we can only discuss what we take for certain in an agreed frame. Otherwise words are meaningless and purposeless.
What woke you up?
I woke up long before getting introduced into science, when I was a little kid. Nothing prompted me, it just stopped making sense by itself. So I started to look for sense, and I found salvation in science, then it became my religion.
reply
That's another point I want to make. There being a story doesn't make anything true. That is why I quoted a man at a bus stop. I respect your views. It's just a different journey than mine. To me science as an art is beautiful. Science as a religion is dangerous.
reply
That is why I quoted a man at a bus stop.
Whose story is unverifiable and thus can't be taken as true.
Science as a religion is dangerous
So far denying science has caused and causes more suffering than the opposite. That's specially true when politicians deny economic science. I can speak from experience on that.
What is intuition in scientific terms? To me it's the same thing. Maybe you just don't like the word I am using. Words all made up so I am happy to use different words. And Maybe you are right. I truly don't know anything. I'm an observer.
reply
What is intuition in scientific terms?
Inference and interpolation from pattern recognition.
reply