pull down to refresh
542 sats \ 9 replies \ @Scroogey 25 Oct
We can use the trigonometric addition formula
in an inductive proof by contradiction:
- Assumption:
is rational. - Step: if
is rational then must also be rational, because the above formula is the ratio of two rational numbers. - But
which is irrational, hence the assumption must be wrong.
reply
11 sats \ 2 replies \ @south_korea_ln OP 25 Oct
Nice job. This was supposedly an entrance exam question for the University of Kyoto in 2006.
reply
160 sats \ 1 reply \ @Rothbardian_fanatic 25 Oct
I understand the Kyodai and Todai exams are literal nightmares! They have people going to special exam schools for several years on end to get the score high enough to be accepted.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @south_korea_ln OP 26 Oct
Yeah looks pretty extreme. You really need to be trained on this to be able to solve this kind of problem with tight time constraints.
reply
1 sat \ 5 replies \ @SimpleStacker 25 Oct
Nice. Are you a mathematician, @Scroogey?
reply
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @Scroogey 25 Oct
deleted by author
reply
1 sat \ 3 replies \ @SimpleStacker 25 Oct
Pulling out an inductive proof by contradiction, along with an obscure (to me) formula, is impressive for someone who doesn't do proofs on a regular basis :)
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Scroogey 25 Oct
deleted by author
reply
1 sat \ 1 reply \ @SimpleStacker 25 Oct
Proof by contradiction was my favorite method in college. I think it's easier because you know where to start and you just move forward. So even to prove that things are true, I'd just assume the converse and show a contradiction.
Because a non-contradiction based proof seems harder. You know where you want to go, but you don't know where to start.
reply
22 sats \ 0 replies \ @south_korea_ln OP 26 Oct
Yeah, Reductio ad Absurdum were also my favorites.
reply