reply on: E cash privacy nuances \ stacker news ~AskSN

pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 22 replies \ @ek 27 Oct \ on: E cash privacy nuances AskSN

Sender privacy is good on lightning. Receiver privacy is not. So withdrawing from a mint associates the receiver node pubkey with you

1 sat \ 8 replies \ @anon 27 Oct

Wath do u mean with that? What do you know if I give you this: lnurl1dp68gurn8ghj7ampd3kx2ar0veekzar0wd5xjtnrdakj7tnhv4kxctttdehhwm30d3h82unvwqhhx6tcdp6kycmpwqenwwafz69

0 sats \ 7 replies \ @DarthCoin 27 Oct

That is a WoS account. It means it is LOCKED to your mobile IMEI because WoS app cannot be installed without Google services. It means you are kind of tracked, or at least you use a disposable device. NEVER use apps that require google services.

Try yourself here: https://lightningdecoder.com/lnurl1dp68gurn8ghj7ampd3kx2ar0veekzar0wd5xjtnrdakj7tnhv4kxctttdehhwm30d3h82unvwqhhx6tcdp6kycmpwqenwwafz69

0 sats \ 6 replies \ @anon 27 Oct

And form this? lnbc250n1pn3uaylpp5xal4wjntfnjvf0k9yxktksvj2wfjlx7m4n66ty2psx5tlla5aumqdqqcqzzsxqrrssrzjqgc2t099trn8g9rqcy7axnnrdk3gu540myw0j0dc0mgmqwf2w3nwhapyqqqqqqqdl5qqqqqqqqqq86qq2qsp5v4zls44d9jkmh62yl724j8raya7qtx0dwnsxqun0cnw3g7x0q9tq9qxpqysgqf784uwgspwsrzfwea8nwnk5qzt07qj6w6wd6gff7x0tm427pzmqjmajjcnlz8fusplk68q4enhzyr753p855yzmt0d4lr7wauxd54ucpqnpp2n

0 sats \ 5 replies \ @DarthCoin 27 Oct

try it yourself in https://lightningdecoder.com/

You will see there the destination of your node. But that doesn't mean we can find you, your location or who you are. It could be very easily a private node.

0 sats \ 4 replies \ @Aeiou 28 Oct

Why the people say that an invoice can expose the utxo that founded the channel @DarthCoin?

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @DarthCoin 28 Oct

If you open a public channel and also is not a simple taproot channel, then yes, anybody can see it in a LN nodes / mempool explorer.

Options to avoid that?

use STC (simple taproot channels)
buy channels from LSP (it can be full outbound or inbound, or mixed)
open channels with LSPs that offer on-the-fly channels (you open them by paying through LN)
use decoy LN nodes (private and public)
use decoy custodial LN accounts, also can be used to move in/out extra liquidity and fund new channels

I explained all these scenarios in many of my guides.

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Aeiou 28 Oct

If I oppen a private channel with the blixt node... Then nobody knows that I have a private channel and my privacy is good for every scenario? I read your guides but I did not find this scenario.

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @DarthCoin 28 Oct

Blixt is a private LND node that supports STC. So yes, you have more privacy using it.

but I did not find this scenario.

I can't say everything in those guides because I do not want to make "others / bad guys" job too easy. Some parts you have to discover yourself.

view replies

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @byzantine OP 27 Oct

so the mint knows which token was associated with which pubkey sats withdrawal but does not know which node sent in the sats

0 sats \ 6 replies \ @anon 27 Oct

Why did you say the receiver privacy is not good?

22 sats \ 5 replies \ @ek 27 Oct

@DarthCoin explained in #742276.

Another privacy issue with LN in general is that HTLCs use the same payment hash for every hop so surveillance nodes could track payments which happen to route through them. PTLCs fix that.

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @Aeiou 27 Oct

@ek I don't think he explained well. Can you explain it to me?

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @ek 27 Oct

What did you not understand in his explanation?

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Aeiou 27 Oct

Why the receiver privacy is not good in the lightning network?

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Aeiou 27 Oct

@ek that's what I din understand

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @anon 27 Oct

No, It didn't. So, can you explain?

0 sats \ 4 replies \ @DarthCoin 27 Oct

hmmm that's why SN wants to be the "interceptor" for all so called p2p zaps in SN? To find out each stacker node?

hehehe that's why I like to run decoy nodes and wallets. Nice try SN, 😂😂😂😂

Receiver privacy is not.

Now with blinded paths, yes.

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 27 Oct

I assume you want me to assume you’re not trolling again?

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @DarthCoin 27 Oct

define trolling

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 27 Oct

what you’re doing 👀

21 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 27 Oct

what am I doing? commenting your posts? Is that not allowed here? I paid for it, remember? Or now all comments are considered trolling ? Ok let's rename SN into "pay to troll" then.