reply on: @Siggy47 is 'New Voice of SN', Wins October Music Pool \ stacker news ~Music

92 sats \ 7 replies \ @Coinsreporter 30 Oct \ parent \ on: @Siggy47 is 'New Voice of SN', Wins October Music Pool Music

I think it's slightly mistaken here about votes. This month's pool was judged on the basis of 'Top Ranks' by SN filter on the post. Top first got 100 points, 2nd 50, 3rd got 30 and the rest got 10 points each for every round of a game. At last all points are calculated and we've the winners based on this. I tried voting system the last month. If we're calling zaps as votes, it's fine.

As a judge, I don't think you'll do great. The method I'm thinking about is zapping the entries of participants in descending sats. The song that you judge as the best representation of the game should be zapped highest and you can even leave any without zapping for they were just shared for the sake of sharing.

I think it'd be better to share a percentage of sats to the judge/judges from the posts for them to zap back on the songs they think deserve to be the winners for a specific round. But, it's not your zapping alone that will decide the outcome, if a song entry recieves Stackers attention and it reaches on top, it'll be the winner. Ultimately the winner should be decided by the 'top filter.'

What do you say?

60 sats \ 6 replies \ @Public_N_M_E 30 Oct

Ahhh I understand. Don't think I'll do great 😱😱😱 don't worry I'm fairly certain that was a typo 🤣🤣.

Yeah I can do that.

92 sats \ 3 replies \ @Coinsreporter 30 Oct

Thanks Have you read the last part of the comment above?

As @grayruby said would you also like to be the executioner of the pool?

60 sats \ 0 replies \ @Public_N_M_E 30 Oct

No no, I don't want to take over the pool. You're doing great work with it and I hope to watch it grow under your administration.

The judge, jury & executioner is a turn of phrase which may get lost on non native English speakers.

I think that works (the last part) it's definitely worth trying out.

20 sats \ 1 reply \ @grayruby 30 Oct

Haha. I meant executioner as in eliminating people not actually executing the pool.

I think pool administrator should get 10% of pot and judge 10% of pot. That would be something worth testing out.

71 sats \ 0 replies \ @Coinsreporter 31 Oct

Yes, that's a good idea. For the judge I'll be doing a percentage for sure. As an administrator, I think it's not necessary for I kept zaps of buyin post and some days @SN_MusicPool got daily rewards, by which the pool pays fees for posts and zaps every song with 10 sats. The Pool Prize ths month is 13k sats and I've 12.5 or something in the end so it's not at loss as an administrator.

61 sats \ 1 reply \ @Coinsreporter 31 Oct

Yes, that was a typo. Sorry about that.

As a judge, I'd be forwarding you 20% on all the posts. But, you won't be able to participate in the pool.

If we can get one more judge, I'll be forwarding 10% to each.

40 sats \ 0 replies \ @Public_N_M_E 23h

Sounds good. Looking forward to it.