pull down to refresh
It's worth remembering that "trusting the experts" and "following the science" required one to be an avid supporter of eugenics at one point.
Enter my favorite scene from It's Always Sunny https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zgk8UdV7GQ0
Epistemic humility is too much to ask from our intellectual superiors
The two big medical ones that come to mind for me are bloodletting and lobotomy. I think people don't really get the issue though. The issue is as you say, trusting the experts without question. Not that someone got something wrong in the past. That will always be true. But questioning the orthodoxy of science and really society is opposed with great prejudice. I get it to some extent. There are many simple minded people that are easily duped. But they are easily duped by scam artists and people that are just arrogantly wrong.
Let the best ideas win.
I'd put it this way: It's fine to trust experts, but it's stupid to hold a differing view in contempt when you understand neither the official position nor the dissenting one.
None of us have time to learn everything, so we rely on heuristics. If your heuristic is to just trust the official position, that's fine, but have some humility about it.
Yeah, that's good.
This excerpt from the textbook used in the schools of Tennessee at the time of the trial is pretty wild to read in 2024. And it is important to remember that progressives held many of these views at the time.
[1]
One is left wondering why we often hear about the abhorrent views of Nazi Germany but rarely hear what was taught in government schools many years before WW2. This history has been largely white washed from our culture. The ideas of Eugenics have been rejected thankfully but we should not forget how in the past many of the elite and intellectuals espoused such ideas. Its an important reminder that while science is a beautiful system for understanding our world it does not provide a moral framework for mankind.
Civic Biology - Wikipedia ↩