pull down to refresh
176 sats \ 0 replies \ @SimpleStacker 31 Oct \ parent \ on: How FTX’s Young Executives Shattered Their Parents bitcoin
This is just my personal opinion, but I have two criticisms:
-
It rests on faulty assumptions about the possibility of moral/ethical neutrality which can be somehow determined scientifically. In practice, it is a tool for moving power into the hands of those with "expert" credentials to determine what is good policy and what is not.
-
It is too easily used as a veneer for people to hide their selfish behavior / selfish intentions behind public acts of charity.
It reminds me of Jesus's saying in the book of Matthew:
Oftentimes, the veneer of virtue that charity imparts can actually lead people to worser behavior in their private lives. I've heard this first hand from some friends who work in the non-profit/NGO space. (Though this is more a criticism of any kind of non-profit/charity/activism, and not necessarily a criticism of effective altruism per se.)