pull down to refresh
Agree, abstract the solution to key signing and you allow for open integration for many providers (LNAuth included) and a clear and easy standard moving forward.
reply
pull down to refresh
Agree, abstract the solution to key signing and you allow for open integration for many providers (LNAuth included) and a clear and easy standard moving forward.
Before reading the article I was wondering what do they mean exactly with PW managers supporting ln-auth.
Then I read this in the article:
"Why not" is a terrible justification.
Why on earth would we need a LN wallet without any funds, incorporated in the PW manager just for logins?
It does not actually solve any issue.
It's like the author tihinks ln-auth tech is cool but does not really understand it.
Ln-auth is just automated key signing. You can solve the issue with logins by just using that, no need for a defunded LN wallet inside a PW manager.
The future I see for online logins is one where ln-auth is one possible source of key signing type authentication. Others would be HW wallets, yubikeys and PW managers themselves using their bultin cryptography.