31 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b OP 2 Nov \ parent \ on: SN elects to go noncustodial on Nov. 5th - FAQ & AMA meta
Yes, that would be the plan.
The rewards pool approach wouldn't fix this exactly because you wouldn't get the sats you're zapped from those folks either - it'd go to the rewards pool. But, the rewards pool would be larger, and if you qualified for rewards, the sats you got in rewards would be larger.
We were planning to do that with CCs, e.g. "you could've stacked sats but got CCs instead."
I do like the cleanness of the reward pool approach though. Adding another asset complicates things a lot. I'll keep thinking on it more.
Thanks for clearing this up k00b, appreciate it bud.
You are doing great work trying to navigate the money transmission laws, thanks for all you do.
reply