If elected officials are in the habit of voting to suit their own ideologies — even when it means overriding the ideological preferences of many voters — then its hard to see how we can also call this “representative” or a system that transmits “consent” from the voters to their political representatives.
And yet, in spite of all the evidence that elected officials neither know the preference of voters, nor vote in accordance with them, we continue to be told that governments must be respected and obeyed because they have legitimacy granted to them by the fact they are “democratic” and “representative.”
Yes, are they ours or somebody else's? Hasn't this question been pretty much settled lately?
4 sats \ 1 reply \ @Aardvark 8h
Public support, or lack thereof, has zero effect on the odds of a bill being passed into law.
Your representatives literally don't represent you.
reply
That was one of the points of the article. Now that we know this, why are we giving our consent through the ballot box? We need to represent ourselves.
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @flat24 4h
Yes, are they ours or somebody else's? Hasn't this question been pretty much settled lately?
I'm sure that they are not ours, they represent others with different interests... I'll stick with what the title says "Politicians Do Not Represent Me"
reply
That is the most reasonable interpretation of what the representatives are up to.
reply