related posts
3 sats \ 1 reply \ @deleted231216 OP 12 Jan 2022
deleted by author
reply
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @nout 12 Jan 2022
For folks that do add a vote, please be civil, don't spam. Yelling at the other side of the argument has exactly the opposite effect from what you want...
reply
2 sats \ 0 replies \ @UlfMoby 13 Jan 2022
Hahahaahahahahaha… we are so early in bitcoin still.
reply
2 sats \ 0 replies \ @cliftonbride 12 Jan 2022
If you do comment: DO NOT MENTION THE ENVIRONMENT AT ALL.
Change the dialog to focus on the humanitarian benefits bitcoin provides persons in unstable communities.
Property rights for those whose governments cannot protect. Etc
reply
2 sats \ 0 replies \ @oshisat 12 Jan 2022 freebie
Jesus.. we’re gonna live the next years with this green-washing stuff, aren’t we?
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @cryptocoin 14 Apr 2022
UPDATE
The RFC has een closed, with 232 long-time editors of Wikipedia voicing support for ending cryptocurrency donations, while 94 opposed the move.
Now it is up to the Wikidpedia Foundation (which, I'm assuming, is simply a formality before finalizing the decision to stop accepting bitcoin).
*Wikipedia community votes to stop accepting cryptocurrency donations(
#19815
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2022/04/wikipedia-community-votes-to-stop-accepting-cryptocurrency-donations
reply
1 sat \ 1 reply \ @shyfire 12 Jan 2022 freebie
Wikipedia is overrun with woke crazies. As an example, take a look at the original definition of cultural Marxism: https://archive.md/xIiRF
Now take a look at the 2022 definition: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_Marxism_conspiracy_theory
Don't support wikipedia IMO
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Jorj_X_McKie 13 Jan 2022 freebie
WTF! Wikipedia is a joke. I wouldn't even notice if it was gone.