pull down to refresh

19 sats \ 2 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic 19 Nov \ parent \ on: The (Predictable) Defeat of Moderate Reforms | The Libertarian Institute Politics_And_Law
What do you mean "discretely" there is no discretely about it. It is in-your-face rigging. We have a one-party situation and there is no breaking out, shy of revoking RCV. Apparently, Joseph Solis-Mullen does not live in one of these sh*tholes.
write
preview
20 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined OP 19 Nov
What I mean is the design of the RCV system doesn't have to obviously favor one party or the other.
The counting and scoring rules might sound perfectly reasonable, but there were literally an infinite number of other options that would have seemed just as reasonable.
reply
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic 19 Nov
Ok, seeming reasonable and being reasonable are two vastly different situations. The obviousnes of the situation is not always there. It is quite hidden because it requires a majority vote to put into place. Not everyone in any party appreciates rigging.
reply