pull down to refresh

20 sats \ 2 replies \ @Enemy_of_the_state 20 Nov \ parent \ on: Chaos in the Senate Yesterday Politics_And_Law
I think it’s a rubber stamp unless they have don’t have a quorum (not an expert, just spitballing here…)
write
preview
57 sats \ 1 reply \ @Rothbardian_fanatic 20 Nov
I think they need to have a quorum. Therefore if they are not there, there can be no votes. One party can try as hard as they want to drive things through, but they need a quorum. Therefore quorum calls and Sargent-at-arms. They need to have at least 51 senators present for a quorum. I don’t think they are allowed to vote without the quorum. So, no rubber stamping without a quorum.
reply
40 sats \ 0 replies \ @Cje95 OP 20 Nov
There were a couple of hearings going on which I think is what caused issues with a quorum because there often were not 51 Members in the chamber which allowed Republicans to question voting.
reply