pull down to refresh
163 sats \ 3 replies \ @Undisciplined 17h \ on: Who are the most generous Stackers? meta
There are different idiosyncracies that make it hard to say. Some zap lots of people, with little regard for quality, while others zap only a few, but they zap those a lot.
I know higher quality posts get more zaps, but I don't know if the quality would be worse had the expected zaps been less. I suspect those authors would adjust by posting less often, more so than posting lower quality.
while others zap only a few, but they zap those a lot.
Friends zapping friends is one big trend I've seen here. Even some 100k posts are the proof of it. But as I said zapping is subjective to taste, it remains high when you can be consistent and have made friends with more people.
reply
I do zap regular writers than I might for similar quality one-off posts. That’s not specifically because we’re friends, but rather because I want regular contributors to stick around.
reply
I wasn't pointing at you. I think you fall in other category which is -
Some zap lots of people, with little regard for quality,
I'm sorry ;) but that's how you described it.
That first comment was for those who'll zap only a few but zap them so much that every other post looks so inferior against them.
You'll get my point when you look at here by changing filter from zaprank to Sats.
reply