Since a few months all the graphics are going down ....
Any reason ?
Is it a will to have less stackers ?
if not, what it s needed for stackers to come back ?
pull down to refresh
315 sats \ 2 replies \ @k00b 13h
Contrary to popular belief, product growth has to be actively worked on.
We slowed down then stopped actively working on growth starting late last year to focus on non-custodial wallets.
Most of what's visible in the charts is a dropoff in March and then a plateau until now.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nym 12h
Nice
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Roll OP 12h
thks for the precision ....
reply
105 sats \ 1 reply \ @flat24 15h
I think it's okay since this is a small family, once SN becomes a massive platform it will surely stop being interesting, on the other hand I think that most of the new players come here wanting to earn SATS but without understanding the dynamics of the platform and the VxV so they end up stopping using it.
and remember that SN is a simple and minimalist platform. people are used to all the noise and saturation that exists in other social networks and that is why it is also difficult for them to adopt it.
What I think is great... don't ever change SN just to attract more people @k00b.
I think SN is great the way it is now.
"We are who we are and we are who we are"
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Roll OP 15h
It s true "small family" :)
i was also like that, i did not understand SN at the begining, it took me time and energy to flip the coin
Thks for your interpretation, point of view... :)
reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @DesertDave 14h
It's going exactly the way we want. Patience.
reply
11 sats \ 0 replies \ @Roll OP 14h
:)
reply
42 sats \ 1 reply \ @Wumbo 15h
I wonder if Nostr becoming more popular (I don't know if this is true) has lead to people posting less on SN.
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @Roll OP 15h
Nostr (color, similar to X, more users....) is more atractive vs SN
reply
11 sats \ 6 replies \ @freetx 14h
I've been harping on this awhile, but I think territories are mispriced. At current prices thats $1200 per year....can't see that being sustainable? Or maybe I'm wrong and owners are doing fine?
reply
0 sats \ 5 replies \ @Roll OP 14h
At current prices thats $1200 per year....can't see that being sustainable?
what do you mean ?
reply
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @freetx 14h
100k sats per month = approx $100 per month X 12 months = $1200
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @Roll OP 14h
where did you get this information ?
reply
21 sats \ 2 replies \ @freetx 14h
Which part? The cost of territories? If you go to "create" at bottom of territory list it takes you to page to register a territory for $100K sats per month.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Roll OP 14h
arf arf
my english is not so good so i ve dificulties to follow you.. ;)
but i believe i do now
let s see if one of the owners answer to your questions...
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @freetx 14h
Easier to see.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @denlillaapan 15h
Interesting -- and terrifying. It doesn't really feel like it, but I'm new here.
What would you say is the reason?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Roll OP 15h
May be users are looking for something more
-friendly
-color
-similar to X
-where you do not need to pay for a post
-do not want to spend sats
-the process where you need time and sats (post links, comment, zap, create post: story etc...)
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @OT 16h
I was thinking the other day what happened to @kr?
I also noticed that it seemed to get easier to get a post shoot up near the top. Even an average one.
reply