pull down to refresh

The last word are node runners, beyond miners. Both define ‘final consensus’. Have CUSF and others forms of soft forks, but this is a kind of thing for another discussion.
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 3h
Do you mean with "reject as a node runner" to upgrade my node to something that rejects blocks with OP_CTV in it and thus creates a hard fork? I think that's what bcashers did with their nodes but I am not sure. I wasn't around at that time.
reply
That’s the point I’m leveraging here. I wanna see what nodes would do in this hypothetical scenario.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 3h
Okay, so "accept" means to do nothing? Isn't that the same as "neutral"?
Or "accept" = "upgrade node to version with OP_CTV" and "neutral" = "do nothing"?
reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @Rsync25 OP 2h
Yes! Second option.
reply