pull down to refresh
212 sats \ 7 replies \ @grayruby 26 Nov \ on: Why Stacker.news charging 30% fees on ZAPs lightning
Due to excessive zapsturbation. (people zapping themselves to rank higher in the hot/top lists and in the rewards pool and get more sats).
Personally, I think it is a bit high but it is something they wanted to test. I like 20%.
I prefer a graduated scheme, where long-running, active accounts can have lower sybil fees and newer, less active accounts have higher fees (after some grace period for newbies).
Honestly, though, I'm pretty content paying a 30% tax to have access to this service right now. There's nothing else like it on the internet as far as I can tell
reply
reply
stackers have outlawed this. turn on wild west mode in your /settings to see outlawed content.