pull down to refresh
So that means you were wrong when you said it:
No, you won't if it's a new address. #786171
No, I was right about it in the sense as explained in the resource I shared not your misunderstanding about the native public property of Blockchain...
I think you just didn’t get @0xbitcoiner‘s point: in the case of consolidation, all inputs are linked together, no matter if he sends them to a new address or not.
I would still use a new address since this slightly increases privacy: with a new address, it is not guaranteed that the output belongs to the same owner of the first address.
Now I get it. Thanks!
No worries. Too many parrots out there with a lack of understanding nuances.
Lol 🤣 take it easy professor...
I must not be understanding something. What's the difference in terms of privacy in sending all utxo's to a new address or to address 1?
Read the article I shared #786251
big parrot vibes
Bitcoin and generally cryptocurrency Blockchains are public ledgers so
recorded and available for others to watchare fundamental features in everyone of them.What I meant by reusing addresses is a bad practice for privacy was basically described here