pull down to refresh

I don't think they're evil, I don't think these businesses have malicious intent but the capacity to be malicious remains and the regulatory risk involved remains, for small balances sure, what's the point of having a node to receive 21 sats zaps? Your sunk cost is more than you'll ever use?
I agree with the whole disingenuous aspect of using custodial services to punt Bitcoin's network, like LN isn't cheap, you need a node, you need to understand the technical aspects, and manage operational cost of rebalancing, and staying online.
If you're a business it shouldn't be too much of an issue but for an individual, id say unless you're doing $500 worth of Bitcoin purchases per month whats the point of using non-custodial LN?
It's okay to rebalance now with on-chain because the fees are low, but if we get to a place where 100-200 sat per vbyte hangs around for a long time, rebalancing through a Liquid or RSK has to be entertained at some point, no?
Theres no ark, channel factories etc, yet, so the toolkit is there, again use if you understand the risks
the percentage of people today, buying at least 500$ of Bitcoin per month... I believe is a very small percentage. Very small.
Stacker News is a bubble no question and is not representative of the 'general population' even of a Western country... much less "the whole world". The vast majority of people still don't know much about Bitcoin, if anything at all. And Lightning is completely unheard of
reply
Yeah don't hate your pathway, it's pretty smooth and strikes a nice balance
reply