pull down to refresh

BTW I tried the wallet, but there is a thing that is not working or missing, If you receive in lightning (i know it swap it to liquid) , then you cannot pay a regular Bitcoin onchain address. Thats is needed as so far almost none ATM use liquid or lightning.
That is correct. I hope they add that feature in the future. I think the point of the wallet... was to onboard people to lightning in the least painful, but non-custodial way possible.
It is possible to accept on-chain on the wallet... but the developers have stated the Wallet is designed for lightning mostly..
Edit: I hope that most/all BTMs will use Lightning in the future. As fees rise it's logical that they all will to reduce fees and get quick payouts, liquidty, balanced channels etc.
reply
Well, i think is a mistake to not allow people to use mainchain if needed. I think AQUA is better option for this ( the UX sucks i know).
reply