pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @iguano 2 Dec \ on: How Bitcoin Scales w/o Forks: the Lightning, Liquid, On-Chain Triangle bitcoin
BTW I tried the wallet, but there is a thing that is not working or missing, If you receive in lightning (i know it swap it to liquid) , then you cannot pay a regular Bitcoin onchain address. Thats is needed as so far almost none ATM use liquid or lightning.
write
preview
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @028559d218 OP 2 Dec
That is correct. I hope they add that feature in the future. I think the point of the wallet... was to onboard people to lightning in the least painful, but non-custodial way possible.
It is possible to accept on-chain on the wallet... but the developers have stated the Wallet is designed for lightning mostly..
Edit: I hope that most/all BTMs will use Lightning in the future. As fees rise it's logical that they all will to reduce fees and get quick payouts, liquidty, balanced channels etc.
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @iguano 3 Dec
Well, i think is a mistake to not allow people to use mainchain if needed. I think AQUA is better option for this ( the UX sucks i know).
reply