pull down to refresh

@k00b shared a post about the new FBI director Trump is putting up for his admin.
He talks a big game. Moving the office in DC to KC. Moving the workforce out of Mordor back into the lands of the people they are supposed to be working for. He talks about saving money and sending the unused budget back to Congress. It reminded me of my time working in IT in government education. I was young and conservative. Naive in many ways. I had a budget to spend on equipment and I recall my boss telling me we need to spend this money before the end of the year. He explained that if we don't use all the money we have they won't give us that much next year. More than that, you can forget about asking for a bigger budget. This really bothered me but at the same time I was in no position to change it. It was no skin off my nose so I found some ways to use the funds.
I learned one of many lessons I would learn working in government education. Now, to be fair conservatives often talk about this kind of thing in government and act like it doesn't exist in private businesses. It does. The larger the organization the more likely it will exist. Heads of departments want to grow their departments. They want more money. The aren't really looking to economize. But, the difference in private businesses is that there is a profit motive. A force pushing back on the Iron Law of Bureaucracy. In a word, incentives.
And here lies the problem Trump or any politician seeking to reform government faces. When you seek to shrink a government program or agency you are pushing against many opposing incentives. Even if you succeed in your reforms the tide is always pushing the opposite way. The only way to keep the state from growing in size and scope is for the population to desire and require it. Then you need politicians and officials that will seek to work against their own incentives and keep government trim. I'm not saying its impossible. It would be possible if you had a nation of Ron Pauls...
The reality is power is the one ring. Those who see government power are either corrupted from the start or will be corrupted by it. I like to think of DC as Mordor in this analogy. The state is the dark lord. Its not Biden or Trump. They just have the ring for a short time. Power is corrupting all those in their orbit. I know, that sounds dark. That's how I view it. But, I'd rather hear people talking about cutting than growing the state. It just all sounds naive to me. I'm reminded of my younger self.
The sad thing is that what is being discussed by Trump is at best a temporary patch job. The real problems all boil down to incentives. These are incentives that are at the foundation of the state. And, its not just in government but in the popular culture and education. There's a reason government grows no matter who is in power. Incentives. If you run for congress and the outcome is your district gets less funding for schools and projects that create jobs? Are you gonna get re-elected? Unlikely. The only way that works is if the population is interested in the workings of government and have conviction about small government. I think we can all agree that this is not the case. There are few that are but they are a small number. Most people are uninterested. They sure aren't interested in boring topics like incentives. Sure, many follow politics but that's just a drama show to garner votes and get slime balls attention. Few are interested in economics, incentive structures, and governance.
I'm ready to watch the show though. Season three of the Trump show should be an interesting if Trump can survive it.
If you want a good laugh and to see some of what I'm talking about in a funny BBC show from the 80s check out "Yes! Minister". It should be required viewing for any conservative thinking they can "fix" government.
I have many thoughts about talking about the negative effects of incentives on things progressives claim to care about. Taking care of the needy. Charity and that sort of thing. The reality is that the state is terrible at caring for people for many of the same reasons I stated above.
So if you care about the homeless, the poor, and helping people that are on the margins the worse thing you could do is not nothing. Its to get the state involved.
What I usually hear from my progressive friends is that they don't think the public would care for the poor and sick if the government didn't do it...
This contradicts the lie we are told that the government has our consent. Both of these can't be true. If the public would not choose to help those in need so we need the government to do it. That is a round about way of saying we need a bully to steal from the public and use that money to do things the people wouldn't do.
I would love to see my fellow humans acknowledge reality. The state is violence. Period. Its not legitimate. Its at best a shared delusion we all are fed from birth to the grave. We can't really move forward if we are living lies. If we lie to ourselves we can't grow.
Anyway....
reply
NGOs have become so corrupt and venal, vehicles for money laundering
reply
My sense is that the heads of DOGE, and many of the other nominees, fundamentally do not get it. This isn't the kind of problem where a group of heroes can swoop in and save the day.
Fix the incentives -> fix the problem.
One thing that would make an immediate and dramatic impact would be implemented financial bonuses for managers who reduce costs. Make it 1% of whatever savings they found, but still hold them accountable for whatever outputs they're responsible for.
reply
I think they may get it. Vivek at least. But are just looking for wins where they can get them. I respect that for what it's worth.
But I agree, on the whole conservatives do not get how deep the rot is. They don't understand the fundamentals and the incentives.
Maybe this next four years will open more eyes to the level of rot.
reply
I agree that Vivek seems to get it, at least intellectually. I doubt he really grasps how intractable these agencies are, though. If he did, I think all of the efforts would be geared towards eliminating departments, agencies, and programs.
reply
Heads need to roll
reply
100%
reply
This contradicts the lie we are told that the government has our consent.
Yes, furthermore one of the most perverse aspects of the state is that it "crowds out real charity"
Imagine a "progressive fantasy" state. Everyone is taxed at 75% and those taxes are redistributed according to need. In such an environment, there will be no charity (and thus no care) for the less fortunate. Everyone has already given all that they can be asked to give....
The perverse outcome of this is it produces a less compassionate and less tolerant society.
reply
The age of the so called robber baron was also a time of great philanthropy
More colleges and hospitals and schools were created between 1870 and 1914 than any other period in American history
reply
So called is right.
reply
I know... it is really absurd.
reply
101 sats \ 6 replies \ @freetx 3 Dec
I was talking about this issue with my sister recently and she mentioned how the Catholic Catechism guides that all charity should be done on the smallest possible scale.
Its better for you to help someone in need, then for your neighborhood to help them.
Its better for your neighborhood to help them, then the local parish church
Its better for your church to help them, then your local city
etc...etc...
There is a lot of wisdom in that idea, and its telling that the State always opts for exactly the reverse.
reply
This is deep wisdom. As anyone that has ever done something for someone in need. The giver is rewarded in ways that you would not expect.
100% co-sign that.
In my view the progressive movement's desire to even care about the marginalized comes out of Jesus impact on humanity. Yet, they hate Him.
I also think that followers of Jesus have really allowed the state to come into a role they should not have. Individuals and churches do a lot to help the needy but the fact that the state is so massive and overpowering, they have ceded ground that should have never been given.
reply
45 sats \ 4 replies \ @freetx 3 Dec
In my view the progressive movement's desire to even care about the marginalized comes out of Jesus impact on humanity. Yet, they hate Him.
I'm always amazed by this. It is mind-bending to me. Jesus was the perfect progressive. He taught that we are all children of God and thus all brothers/sisters. We should love our neighbor as ourselves....
Yet, they seem to have a revulsion to Jesus. They visibly cringe and pull back if you mention any of this.....its almost as if they are possessed.
they have ceded ground that should have never been given
Precisely.
reply
And the hate is reserved for Christianity and Judaism. Other religions have immunity
reply
75 sats \ 0 replies \ @freetx 3 Dec
Whoever hates me hates my Father also. If I had not done among them the works that no one else did, they would not be guilty of sin, but now they have seen and hated both me and my Father. But the word that is written in their Law must be fulfilled: ‘They hated me without a cause.’
To be fair, plenty of progressives say they love Jesus. Its Christians they hate. And as a Christian that's fair. But they sure don't like all the things Jesus said. Nor does anyone really. Jesus offends us all.
reply
52 sats \ 0 replies \ @freetx 3 Dec
Jesus offends us all
Yes, the Sermon on the Mount is an impossible commandment for us flawed humans to live up to. But we must strive to....
I don't know what the results of the Trump administration will be... In fact, I've written before that I believe Mr. Trump is not a stabilizing force for the United States or necessarily the world.
If anything good comes out of his administration however... it will be reforms to capital gains taxes on Bitcoin so that hodlers will feel free-er to spend Bitcoin on coffee and day to day items (via lightning) and businesses free to accept it... without worrying about ridiculous tax reporting.
I understand that government wants 'its cut' especially where there are traders involved. However Bitcoin is money and people should feel free to spend their money they've worked hard for on day-to-day expenses without feeling like they're a 'trader' because that's absolutely not what Bitcoin is about.
reply