pull down to refresh

Two biggest risk factors are:
(a) A major custodian (like Coinbase) is hacked. This could produce such a backlash that Wallstreet + Regulators came out and said: "Digital Assets are inherently incapable of being properly held securely in custody accounts" and that would effectively end most official support for it.
(b) Future code updates introduces a critical catastrophic bug that is exploited - imagine millions of coins either permanently lost or stolen. While this could possibly be mitigated via a variety of different ways, it may set back public adoption by a few decades.
apparently 98% of CB customer funds are stored in offline, geographically distributed cold wallets, which are disconnected from the internet
the liquidity stuff in hot wallets is insured, to a point, so i don't think that would be super catasropihc
reply
Xapo
Coinbase purchased Xapo cold storage a few years ago
reply
11 sats \ 0 replies \ @freetx 5 Dec
Exactly. Its xapo custody.
Back in the day Xapo was buying old military missile silos (I think) that they were using as their off-grid key storage facilities.
reply
11 sats \ 0 replies \ @freetx 4 Dec
Yes, but internet is not required. You just need enough insider employees who can coordinate their efforts in non-detectable ways.
reply
My guess is Coinbase and MSTR and others such as bitgo have catastrophic insurance
reply