pull down to refresh
30 sats \ 7 replies \ @ama 5 Dec \ parent \ on: B-tree file system devs
Oh, believe me, it's much more than just fine. :-)
I like BSD systems (mainly OpenBSD for it's extreme privacy and security focus, but also NetBSD and FreeBSD) much more than I like Linux for a long time now, and I use them in some boxes. But I mostly use Devuan because I like and depend on btrfs so much...
FreeBSD has ZFS, and NetBSD and other BSD flavors have similar file systems, like hammer, but none of them I like as much as I like btrfs.
Maybe if OpenBSD implemented any of those new generation file systems with CoW, self healing, software RAID capabilities I could make the jump... One can only hope... :-)
I was raised on Unix and like the Berkley flavor. Most of my time was using Data General, HP, Sun and IBM Unixi.
I think this Synology Linux is based on Debian, which is my favorite Linux.
reply
I believe it is, yes.
I used Debian for 26 years as my main driver, until they decided to use systemd and kill the freedom of choice for the init system.
I then upgraded all my boxes from Debian ascii to Devuan ascii to keep my freedom of choice and remain free of the systemd catastrophe.
reply
Is systemd really that bad?
reply
It is, in my opinion. It attempts against the UNIX philosophy of dedicated programs which do one thing well, and it infest all UNIX layers from init to the graphical interface (X) to desktop environments to even some specific software. I truly think it's awful.
But even worse is removing the freedom to chose which init system you want to use. I love that Devuan (the Debian fork which keeps the freedom spirit of the original Debian developers) let me chose between several init systems:
It was sad jumping from Debian after 26 years of unconditional love. But I'm so happy that I finally did it. :-)
reply
OK I'm installing Devuan on that Bitcoin Core system and reloading the blockchain on the NAS.
reply
reply
now's the time to experiment, not a downside in sight.
reply