pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 99 replies \ @justin_shocknet 8 Dec 2024 \ on: Covenant support comparison by Vortex bitcoin
Quite the selection bias of scammers, salaried spooks, and naive shell devs.
Funny that 2 legit developers on the list offer tepid acceptance due to low fork risk for the "weak" options.... this list is backfiring beautifully for the Etheriumification camp.
as usual justin the spammer comes to say hi, and as usual his post has 0 sats
reply
No ones buying your shitfork bro #814976
reply
The covenants discussion continues to heat up and make progress and that's what matters as covenants will come to bitcoin some day in some way or another, despite clueless non-dev clowns like yourself who literally aren't even capable of understanding the op code BIPs but still deciding to spam fud and nonsense everywhere.
reply
non-dev
lol
clowns
D-tier techno-illiterate influencers like you and Shinobi are really heating it up... oh and Ark scammers
Enjoy your shitfork and keep on virtue signaling, you're doing great
reply
keep not reading the BIPs and contributing zero technical argument against them, you're doing great...
reply
I explain things for "the average person" you're shitfork claims to help
Why don't you learn to code and implement them instead of crying?