pull down to refresh

nice historical rundown by our beloved Mr. Selgin... but it's two-thirds in before he even mentions a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve.
Uh-hu...
...and then never really talks about it. Don't bother reading, here's the Tl;dr --
And—let’s be honest—although some Bitcoin fans may sincerely believe that a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve will strengthen the US dollar, many more favor it despite not caring a fig about the dollar’s future because they expect it to make them richer, and don’t mind if it does so at others’ expense.
this is at least correct:
If the US government wants to avoid losing money on its foreign exchange holdings, the sensible way for it to do so is by disposing of those holdings, gradually or otherwise, not by accumulating some other risky asset. Concerning helping precious metal markets: here, for once, is something a gold stockpile does. But then the question becomes, what reason is there for the government to prop up the gold market, other than to enrich gold miners and investors at others’ expense?
They're a relic from a outdated monetary past. Today's monetary arrangements don't need them.
Anyway, Selgin's contribution -- as so often in recent years -- is verbose, sour, and he's def suffering from bitcoin derangement syndrome. Can't make himself say anything positive about BTC.
Unimpressive.