pull down to refresh

it is not, what one might call, an explicit right of a jury, but rather it is a necessary logical consequence of any system that purports to maintain a fair and impartial jury.
I get that lawfully it looks like a logical consequence. But the really interesting question to me is whether the "spirit of the law" intends for justice to go beyond laws or only the "letter of the law" did this accidentally.
I wouldn't be so sure for either option.