reply on: Stacker Saloon \ stacker news

pull down to refresh

18 sats \ 10 replies \ @Satosora 10 Dec \ parent \ on: Stacker Saloon

I have been seeing lots of summaries that are ai made. Can you imagine science journals amd research done with ai?

Yeah I frequently spot it in preprints.

A couple months ago I wasnt using an AI detector, but now I have to just to notice. Some things I can detect by how it reads. Its becoming more widely adopted. Do people really think no one will notice?

30 sats \ 7 replies \ @k00b 10 Dec

It's occasionally hard to spot, but it mostly shows in writing that has words for the sake of having words.

I'm not sure they care if people notice. I think they think it improves their "brand" in aggregate to have the appearance of being a writer even if no one in their right mind would bother reading it.

20 sats \ 4 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic 10 Dec

I think it would be a brand killer for both the author and the AI, if someone got caught using it. Trust factors would evaporate immediately!

30 sats \ 3 replies \ @k00b 10 Dec

Trust probably does evaporate, so either they are stupid or they aren't looking for trust. They might be merely looking for attention.

15 sats \ 1 reply \ @Satosora 11 Dec

People probably get complacent after a while. Especially when they have a fan base.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic 11 Dec

Even if they get complacent and go ahead and cheat it with AI, they will still suffer for doing it. Trust disappears instantly.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic 11 Dec

It could be that they are just looking for sats or in the outside world “fiat” rewards! They are just looking for a payoff with no consideration for consequences.

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Satosora 10 Dec

Its so soulless. Eventually quality will always beat quantity.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic 10 Dec

Even better, soulful writing beats soulless writing every time. I think most people can tell the difference when they read.