pull down to refresh

All the governments of the Western bloc are wedded to Keynesian economics that itself is rooted in the Great Depression of the 1930’s. Against all evidence and completely ignoring Say’s Law of Markets, in his magnum opus The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money, John Maynard Keynes posited that overproduction had caused an unstoppable deflationary price spiral and that the solution was to increase aggregate demand through government spending. This was a godsend to free-spending politicians, who previously had been encouraged—correctly, by the way—to cut government spending in the face of a recession in order to free capital to revive the wealth-generating private sector. The evidence of the rightness of this policy, in addition to its logical correctness, was the post-World War I Wilson-Harding depression that was over in about a year and a half. The government actually cut spending in order to wash out capital-consuming parasites that always emerge during war economies.
Yes, we knew this. The Keynesians are at it again with their collectivist/Marxist spew, that they cannot correct no matter the evidence of their mistakes. Keynesian economics is tailored for the state and only the state’s advantage and perspective. It works wonderfully well for the state, doesn’t it? Go ahead, change my mind.
Even Keynes thought FDR was an idiot.
The issue is that the state (politicians and bureaucrats) has already decided how it's going to behave. Keynesians' crime is in giving them pseudo-intellectual cover.
reply
Yes, they are the court historians, economists and jesters. They just provide the necessary cover jargon for the collectivists for the pay they receive. At least, we the people know better, or at least should be able to see the results all around us and understand what is going on. BTW, FDR wasn’t an idiot, he was doing exactly what was needed for the plans that were made long before his time. By that standard, the destructive job he did was absolutely stellar.
reply
They just provide the necessary cover jargon for the collectivists for the pay they receive.
They aren't generally aware of what they're doing. Most just can't really conceive that the framework handed down to them by the experts is false. They are also sure that heterodox views are deranged and probably dangerous.
I refer to this as The Cult of Respectability. The court historians and economists are confident that they're doing good science, because the important people tell them so. It literally doesn't register with them when their work proves false.
reply
The problem is that they intentionally turn a blind eye to anything heterodox and will not even consider, it let alone investigate it. After all, what are they getting paid for?
reply