pull down to refresh

USD/BTC = $106,165 Block 875,069
A local environmental group plans to push back against a company's efforts to build a water-based energy facility along the Susquehanna River in southern York County, although to what extent and exactly how is uncertain.
York Energy Storage has a permit from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to study their proposal's feasibility and impact, which would take more than 1,000 acres of land from property owners and flood 580 acres along the Susquehanna, according to a news release from Lancaster Conservancy.
But developer Bill McMahon argues his Reading-based company's $2.1 billion project upside of more, cleaner and cheaper energy will benefit residents and the local economy.
The dam would be 9,800 feet long and 225 feet high, surrounded by two dikes forming a reservoir, according to the permit. It would be accompanied by a 150-foot-long, 50-foot-wide concrete-lined emergency spillway. Lake Clarke would be used for a lower reservoir.
It would put out 1.5 million megawatt hours of energy annually, according to the permit. It would also seek to secure land rights of nearly 50 properties — possibly through eminent domain.
The classic for the greater good infrastructure project. Private land owners get stripped of their land to build a dam which will provide great benefits for energy security.
Smucker described the hydroelectric project as reckless, saying it would destroy farms, trails, natural scenery and forests that help protect the ecological health of the landscape and an impaired waterway.
“More than $100 million has been invested in this scenic area over the last decade to preserve our rich agricultural heritage and make the Susquehanna region a tourist and outdoor recreation hub," Smucker said. "We cannot sacrifice that growth in the name of 'clean energy.'"
He said the project, earmarked to improve the energy grid for other providers, would not be completed until 2033 or later.
This looks like a rough project, especially in a place that already has clean energy. Everywhere along the east coast, there is nuclear energy. What is the point of ruining all this habitat for hydro energy? Federal government just trying to find ways to create jobs and spend tax money.
reply
Wow, how did this happen? The state is against any new power projects, at this time. How many people do the screw over? Is there a bunch of mineral wealth in the area? The Biden admin strikes again. Can’t wait for the change.
reply