pull down to refresh

I'm not shocked. The legal tender part was more of a marketing ploy, and it didn't get much use, as far as I know.
21 sats \ 11 replies \ @Fabs OP 9h
It's the fact that these institutions force one to either accept their terms or go under, it's sick and twisted.
reply
In this specific case, I don't blame the IMF, it's El Salvador who needs the money. If I need a loan, I always have the option of refusing the terms, I can't blame the lender, right?
reply
54 sats \ 9 replies \ @Fabs OP 9h
"You need a new kidney or you're going to die within two weeks, the cost of this surgery is $30.000; Do you want to pay in installments with a %15 p.a yield?"
You don't always have much of a "choice", do you?
reply
So now that things haven't gone our way and we need the blessings of fiat (effectively a bailout), we suddenly have to defend fiat, possibly Keynes, and throw praxeology out the window?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Fabs OP 6h
Huh?
reply
It's not quite the same situation. Who fucked up to need a loan? I never thought that one day I would 'defend' the IMF! I think my point is clear. We're all saints and devils in certain situations!
reply
13 sats \ 2 replies \ @ek 8h
Who fucked up to need a loan?
Alex Gladstein wrote a book about that:
The IMF and World Bank were created to help countries survive financial crises and to help them develop into prosperous economic actors. But their 75-year track record shows that their loans and structural adjustment policies have plunged poor countries into impossibly large debt traps and forced the Third World to focus on producing goods for consumption in the West, instead of growing consumption and industry at home. The Bank and the Fund’s “development and assistance” has been anything but. The reality is a history of neocolonial exploitation with shocking results.
reply
57 sats \ 0 replies \ @Fabs OP 8h
Exactly this. They're binding poor countries to the $ ad aeternum.
reply
I understand that and the IMF and others are also devils causing perverse situations. I'll just say this one more time, who asked for and accepted the terms of the loans?
reply
I hear you.
Loans are a feature of fiat. If you embrace the Bitcoin way, don't scream when the fiat overlords don't want to lend you money, so that you can perform a speculative attack on the very fiat system you want to benefit from.
reply
reply
I remember a few years ago when Portugal needed a loan from the troika, I think it was €72B, everyone blamed the troika for the cuts the government was forced to make in order to get the loan. Not me, I blamed the government, which was one of the main culprits in putting us in this situation.
reply