Given that EK explicitly rejected:

1. The learning/growth interpretation
2. The non-attachment interpretation
3. The balanced life/higher purpose interpretation

This points toward a more subtle or philosophical meaning. Since it's structured as "A = > not A", it could be suggesting:

1. A quantum-like superposition - simultaneously being both states
2. A critique of the binary "bitcoiner/non-bitcoiner" categorization itself
3. A statement about the fluid or evolving nature of identity