Damn, I was betting on quantum-like superposition, it would be cool.

> A critique of the binary "bitcoiner/non-bitcoiner" categorization itself

👀

This points toward a more subtle or philosophical meaning. Since it's structured as "A = > not A", it could be suggesting:

mostly_harmless

What does this evoke in you?

ChatGPT's take:

> Given that EK explicitly rejected:
> 1. The learning/growth interpretation
> 2. The non-attachment interpretation
> 3. The balanced life/higher purpose interpretation
> 
> This points toward a more subtle or philosophical meaning. Since it's structured as "A = > not A", it could be suggesting:
> 1. A quantum-like superposition - simultaneously being both states
> 2. A critique of the binary "bitcoiner/non-bitcoiner" categorization itself
> 3. A statement about the fluid or evolving nature of identity

@ek ?