reply on: Covenant support comparison by Vortex \ stacker news ~bitcoin

pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 42 replies \ @theonevortex 19 Dec \ parent \ on: Covenant support comparison by Vortex bitcoin

The purpose of this particular psyop/scam is to prop up FUD narratives around Lightning to gain support for their fake L2 shitcoinery.

This is 100% false, there is no white paper, there is no token, there is no protocol, there is no L2, it's just a set of op codes, when will you learn this?

APO wouldn't appease scammers

I have no idea what this means, maybe provide some context? Literally every LN dev I've spoken to very much wants ln-symmetry so it's going to happen somehow either with APO, LNhance, or some other combo of op codes.

On a side note you seemed to be obsessed with altcoins.

Also what's hilarious is on the link you sent it was mostly only my replies and not yours that people were sending sats to, I wonder why that is?

0 sats \ 41 replies \ @justin_shocknet 19 Dec

You're too stupid for words, enjoy your vTXOs loser

0 sats \ 40 replies \ @theonevortex 19 Dec

I don't know what's funnier, the fact that you just zapped yourself to have more zaps for that screenshot, or the fact that out of my entire reply, that's the only thing you read LOL completely clueless

0 sats \ 39 replies \ @justin_shocknet 19 Dec

Nope, apparently you can't read numbers or threads either

0 sats \ 38 replies \ @theonevortex 19 Dec

I literally quoted your insult of a thread with zero technical argument and showed how it makes no sense but ok

0 sats \ 37 replies \ @justin_shocknet 19 Dec

You're clearly confused mr offline presigned tx

Get help

0 sats \ 36 replies \ @theonevortex 19 Dec

You can absolutely presign a tx offline before then broadcasting it later online, this is basic 101 stuff, and you're the one confused if you think LNhance is a layer 2 or an altcoin.