pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 33 replies \ @justin_shocknet 19 Dec \ parent \ on: Covenant support comparison by Vortex bitcoin
It's op_codes for scams
it's not though and you haven't offered any legitimate proof that it is and your memes make you look even more insane
reply
You think mud farmers can use Bitcoin while offline so I don't care what you think, you can't even read your own links
reply
It's not about what I think though, it's about objectively what does LNhance do for bitcoin, so far you haven't proved you understand what it does, let alone how it's a scam.
reply
objectively what does LNhance do for bitcoin
Gives scammers selling fake L2s clout, and retarded vaults no one cares about.
Simple.
Proponents prove it's a scam every time they say it can do the literally impossible, scaling to mud farmers and offline L2s.
reply
100% objectively false.
You get vaults better than MuSig, ln-symmetry, channel factories, non-interactive channels, payment pools and more efficient transactions just to name a few features.
Simple.
People like you prove you have no idea what they're talking about over and over again by being objectively incorrect about technical features and replying with nothing but profanity.
reply
Symmetry
Then shill APO instead, then at least you won't look like a scammer
Vaults
Garbage
channel factories, non-interactive channels, payment pools
Fake, centrally coordinated, trust-based cope
reply
then shill APO
APO alone is objectively not nearly as efficient costing many more bytes and is more complex than something like CTV + CSFS which are 2 op codes in LNhance.
vaults are garbage
100% objectively false and "garage" is not a technical argument against them
channel factories are fake
100% objectively false, you can read more about these features on utxos.org/uses
Once again you're objectively wrong on everything.
reply
objectively
Using words outside your vocabular breadth again