pull down to refresh

I've explained several ways

You don't like it because you're a disingenuous and mostly illiterate bozo that believes in mythical offline L2s... hopeless case.

And I've explained how you're wrong and you literally couldn't even rebuttal yet still think you're right, so I guess you are indeed a hopeless case. Best of luck spammer.

reply

Would you support a base unit increase to make self custody on-chain more accessible to mud farmers?

reply

Is this your rebuttal to me telling you LNhance is not a scam? Asking me if I would support increasing the supply cap? Of course not, supply cap will never be raised wtf are you even talking about.

reply

Still 21M whole coins

But new millisat based unit

Would solve scaling and is offline

Si or no?

reply

Wow you are going off on an extremely ridiculous tangent. Obviously creating new units doesn't solve any kind of scaling issue whatsoever.

reply

You want to scale to mud farmers (cheaper)

You want solutions that work offline (base chain)

You're willing to fork to do it

So what the problem is?

reply

UTXO sharing is for many people beyond just farmers, there are billions of people in the world like wtaf are you focused on farmers for?

Covenants provide ability to do cold/non-interactive channels. I want this, ln-symmetry and vaults, I don't want to increase the supply cap since I'm not an idiot and understand that does nothing to help scaling.

reply

Utxo sharing is a hoax though, centrally coordinated and trusted if you can't afford a real UTXO

Millisats would let you self custody a single sat trustlessly

Just a lil shitfork bro come on