pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @bartoli 20 Dec \ on: How to attach your LND node to RECEIVE bitcoin from SN via ThunderHub lightning
Is there a real reason to not accept self signed certificate of LND instead of having to provide a 'trusted' one?
I mean, worst case, if I did not give a safe certificate, AND some one spoofed my node's IP, they would receive my zaps. I should be able to accept that risk?
There's no real risk for SN, or is there?
write
preview
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @supratic OP 20 Dec
There's probably no risk for SN, the risk is more that the connection is not ecrypted end-to-end and could attract malicious attacks.
Not really sure about the technicalities or risks on leaving it empty, as is an optional feature.
Maybe @k00b @ek able to provide more info
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @bartoli 20 Dec
I'm ok with it not being optional (although even zeus allows to not provide one!), but i would like it to at least accept the self signed tls.cert of my LND node. Right now, this gitves a 'self signed' error in the SN logs, and my LND node gets the similar error that remote rejected it.
reply