Yes Saylor assists the bankers cartel strategy of increasing institutional custody (where it is not and cannot be used as a p2p MoE) capture and control and reinforces the narrative of Bitcoin as a speculative commodity, not a P2P payments protocol.

This narrative renders Bitcoin harmless to fiats MoE hegemony which is a basis of fiat monetary power. Coinbase (where Saylor holds his BTC) now holds over 10% of all Bitcoin.

At current rates more than half of Bitcoin will be held under US institutional custody by 2030. Bitcoin as a P2P payments protocol has been successfully obstructed by the legacy fiat operators.

They don't need to implement an order 6102฿ as long as Bitcoin MoE use is so successfully constricted . . . but with ever growing institutional custody the efficacy of and potential rationale for any Order 6102฿ (if ever needed) is equally increased.