reply on: Privacy evaluation of messaging apps \ stacker news ~privacy

pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 12 replies \ @Skipper 4 Jan \ on: Privacy evaluation of messaging apps privacy

Nostr is missing from there.

SimpleX is king, but now they support shitcoining so Nostr is the way, i guess

nostr is both very bad for privacy and not a privacy messaging app. Sure there is NIP-104 with MLS but nostr doesn't belong on this list at all.

21 sats \ 1 reply \ @Skipper 4 Jan

https://www.0xchat.com/

10 sats \ 0 replies \ @aljaz OP 4 Jan

ahh yeah i keep forgetting about 0xchat who i see now implemented NIP-101

12 sats \ 4 replies \ @chaum 5 Jan

Whut? Simplex supports a shitcoin? I missed that. Why would they do that?

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @Skipper 5 Jan

Most people missed, including me.

https://simplex.chat/blog/20241210-simplex-network-v6-2-servers-by-flux-business-chats.html

https://runonflux.com/

https://runonflux.com/flux#exchanges

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @chaum 7 Jan

Thank you for the info. Simplex says that using Flux servers and Simplex servers is increasing connection privacy. But does that need to be a blockchain, where you always have a token?

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @nym 7 Jan

I don’t think you need a token for that

23 sats \ 0 replies \ @chaum 13 Jan

As far as I know, a blockchain always has a token.

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @guts 4 Jan

SimpleX is still the way regardless what coin you want to shill

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Skipper 5 Jan

I'm not a monero shitcoiner like you 😊

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @guts 5 Jan

I'm not maxi, I keep using SimpleX

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @pepe78 4 Jan

I use it, it’s fine but still little buggy