pull down to refresh

Yes, this is why I think that Mises’ book is so important. It gives the reasons and the explanation from the ground up on the whys and wherefores of the differences between public and private enterprises. BTW, this is another reason I think Trump might be tilting at windmills. He is basically a private enterprise type of guy whereas he is now running a bureaucracy, a public enterprise. They don’t work the same way, at all. Musk and Ramaswamy are private enterprise guys, too. They are all going to need the help of bureaucrats that are on their wavelength to get anything they want done, done. They have to find someone or many that speak both languages and think both ways. I think those people are very few and far between.
They are all going to need the help of bureaucrats that are on their wavelength to get anything they want done, done.
Yep, been saying this in other ways. The old BBC show "Yes, Minister!" should be required viewing for anyone interested in reforming government.
reply
I think this is one of the reason why the state just keeps on growing. The more the merrier and everyone can have more underlings. It is feudalism on steroids, in my opinion. The only thing is it also so dehumanizing.
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @kepford 7 Jan
100%
This is why I don't think you can really reform it. It has to die. I just hope it isn't by revolution. I'd rather see alternate systems grow and supplant it. That's the best case. Worst case is collapse without alt systems.
Bitcoin is hopeful to me in this context.
reply
BTC certainly covers the money end of things but not much else. I think that private enterprise could cover much of the rest as long as the state gets out of the way and no new gangs solidify control. Revolutions do not seem to work well and are impermanent.
reply