pull down to refresh

Description
Sheldon Richman reflects on Ludwig von Mises' 1944 book 'Bureaucracy,' a short but essential work describing the nature of decision-making within government departments, offices and ministries, and how it differs from market processes in a free economy.
"By nature a bureaucracy faces no profit-and-loss test. It has money expenses in a market-oriented society: it hires willing workers and buys equipment and supplies from willing vendors. However, it does not offer its output to potential consumers, that is, people who are free to say no and take their money elsewhere.
Instead of consumers, a bureaucracy has taxpayers, who must pay whether they want the output or not. This disconnect must have far-ranging consequences. (Government services for which user fees are charged differ in this respect, but the government typically forbids competition.)"
I still haven't read Mises' Bureaucracy, in full. It's a classic work, so I need to rectify that sooner or later.
Sheldon Richman wants something from Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy that they won’t be able to do, and I don’t think they really want to mess with it. The United States has 7,000 state-owned companies, and some private companies are aligned with the state, either out of convenience or fear of retaliation. I have many reservations about Elon Musk's good intentions.
The government and its agencies do not sell their services in the competitive market to consumers who voluntarily choose to buy them, and they are not guided by the profit and loss system, and their revenues are not earned according to the quality of their services.
In private companies that operate in an environment of free competition, the situation is different. In the world of commerce, price signals emitted by the market drive decisions. The profit and loss system shows how scarce resources are being used. If correctly, consumers reward companies by providing them with large profits; if incorrectly, consumers punish companies by imposing losses on them.
reply
That gets me thinking, though. The voters aren't entirely blameless. They have some agency over this situation but they choose not to exercise it and vote for better tax policies and better bureaucratic leaders.
The whole wildfire situation in Los Angeles has me pretty mad, but I find myself getting as about as mad at the voters as the bureaucrats.
reply
Since Covid, I've felt very keenly that it is not tenable to share a society with these people (normie voters and politicians) anymore.
That's why I'm so excited to see parallel systems being built and why I'm so big on voting with my feet.
reply
Sadly I'm too tied down to move
reply
We probably agree about how ineffectual DOGE is going to be.
reply
We definitely agree
reply
30 sats \ 1 reply \ @nym 10 Jan
Just a lot of talk from the think tank
reply
They should really be called "Talk Tanks", am I right?
I'll see myself out.
reply