pull down to refresh

10 sats \ 3 replies \ @nym 11 Jan \ on: The Cost of Facebook’s Now-Repudiated Censorship Politics_And_Law
write
preview
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic OP 11 Jan
The letter or whatever it is is just saying that Zuck and Meta must be responsible for fudiciary duty to increase the shareholders investment as much as they reasonably can. I would question the 2% in BTC, though. They could reasonably go to a higher percentage without taking on too much risk.
reply
5 sats \ 1 reply \ @nym 11 Jan
Good analysis, I wasn’t sure what to make of it
reply
6 sats \ 0 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic OP 11 Jan
They are only doing what they are supposed to do. If they didn’t do it, they could be removed from the board for malfeasance.
reply