pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @ZezzebbulTheMysterious OP 13 Jan \ parent \ on: The Inherent Flaw: Why Decentralized Domain Naming Systems are Doomed to Fail bitcoin
You are missing what I am saying here. The address substitution is occurring at the layer above bitcoin, eg: before it is signed by the user with wallet. This is meat space.
Bitcoin protocol does not allow an attacker to modify a bitcoin transaction when signed. A node cannot interpret a tx as anything but how it was signed. (eg: tx mutability).
As long as the meatspace signing part worked (and we have to assume it did, because Bitcoin cannot effect meatspace).
Everything about DDNS is a problem in the meatspace. You cannot solve it with Bitcoin, which cannot effect meatspace.
As long as the meatspace signing part worked
this is the central caveat which makes it the same problem
you cannot assume this part works in either scenario
reply
Which is the fundamental thesis of my essay, that it cannot solve this problem.
I'm glad you agree with me.
reply
I think it is I who should be thanking you for agreeing with me, since it seems that you no longer feel this way:
I dont agree about your replace -- Bitcoin does not link an on-chain address to an off-chain entity.
reply