pull down to refresh
reply
Why would that be a loss?
My guess is only a tiny fraction of the parkland is used for tourism, and that much of it could be redeveloped without much ecological cost
reply
pull down to refresh
Why would that be a loss?
My guess is only a tiny fraction of the parkland is used for tourism, and that much of it could be redeveloped without much ecological cost
Usually people buy things with intent to use them. If nat parks have tourist values, a new owner has a strong incentive to cater to it