Some artists came here not to get but give. At some point you'll comprehend stackerNews is about community not about sats 

> most territories are not turning a profit.

That seems naive to ask: If they are not profitable, why keep them active?

Taft

Got it, thank you so much! Any plans on reducing the fee for territories?) 

Catcher

If I'm looking at this graph right, then the total zaps per month are somewhere around 100-110k sats.

That's the graph for individual zaps. It counts how many times the zap button is pressed. The amount of sats zapped is in the 

So the amount zapped per month is actually between 2.5m and 4.5m sats.

So we have 20+ territories, all sharing the total income of 100k, while spending 50k per month each? Or what am I missing?

You're missing post fees as a source of revenue (1-2m sats per month).

But even with these corrected numbers your implied conclusion is still correct: most territories are not turning a profit.

charts_and_numbers

How much a territory can earn per month

> If I'm looking at this graph right, then the total zaps per month are somewhere around 100-110k sats.

That's the graph for individual zaps. It counts how many times the zap button is pressed. The amount of sats zapped is in the `spending` graph:

![](https://m.stacker.news/73376)

So the amount zapped per month is actually between 2.5m and 4.5m sats.

> So we have 20+ territories, all sharing the total income of 100k, while spending 50k per month each? Or what am I missing?

You're missing post fees as a source of revenue (1-2m sats per month).

But even with these corrected numbers your implied conclusion is still correct: most territories are not turning a profit.