So nearly everybody in bitcoin hates ESG for all the obvious reasons. I'm not going to recap all that right now. That assumed, the E and S make a lot of sense on the personal level though, right? The problem is when they're used on an economic level. A ________(fill in the blank industry) company's bottom line is in no way benefitted by shrinking their environmental footprint or being more socially equitable.
One might be annoyed that his or her transaction was ignored (not sure censored is even the correct word here), but isn't this also really bad for MARA's bottom line? Are we starting to see a new type of ESG for a new political era? Maybe this example could be of the O for obsequious? We just need two more letters and we can start rating companies on a system that has nothing to do with them delivering a good product or service.
Either way, its time for us home miners to kick into overdrive! Yee-haw!