pull down to refresh

The election is upon us. We wonder whether we have to have war, tariffs, and deficit spending, regardless of whom we support. What are we to do? Faced with the intractable problems of misgovernment, we need to look deeper. Following the great Murray Rothbard, we should ask, do we need a State at all? Rothbard’s answer was a clear “No.” And not only do we not need a State; the State is a menace.
Following Franz Oppenheimer and Albert Jay Nock, Rothbard identified the State as a predatory organism. It is the “organization of the political means.” The State produces nothing by itself but takes what other people have produced. From this we can deduce a vital fact. Society must have existed before the State. Otherwise, there would be nothing for the State to take.
But you may wonder, how is this possible? Whatever its defects, don’t we need a State to ensure that we have law and order? If we have property rights, don’t we need a legal order defining these rights? The answer is that we do need law and order, and we do need a legal system. But people can establish law and order without the State.
FTS!!!, this is the only answer to the state and state power. I guess it looks like the mouse standing up to the cat and giving it the finger, even if it is the only think you can do. They did it in Ireland for 1,000 years before Perfidious Albion conquered them and gave them state slavery and potato blight. They shipped thousands to the Western Hemisphere as chattel, until the Revolution of 1776, then they shipped them as starving refugees until the Civil War was over. The state is totally unnecessary. It doesn’t matter who is in charge of the state or what their good intentions are, they all look alike to me. FTS!!! FTS!!! FTS!!! FTS!!! FTS!!! FTS!!! FTS!!! FTS!!! FTS!!! FTS!!! FTS!!!