pull down to refresh

Yeah true but why does there have to be a risk at all?

Because territory rent is how SN makes revenue and no cost territories would likely be very spammy, as others have noted.

reply

How would they be spammy ? If SN gets rev from posts from all territories instead would that make up the difference

reply

SN doesn't get revenue from posts. It only gets revenue from territory fees. That's the business model.

reply

But if they did

reply

You can always pitch k00b on a different business model. I haven't given the overall business model much thought.

reply

I’m just playing devils advocate a bit here as well and not saying that the way I’m saying is the way or not just good to question things

reply

I get it. With the current setup, they need territories to be costly. That doesn't mean there aren't other possible setups.

In general, SN also leans towards making things costly, because of a belief that it generates higher quality outcomes.

reply

I think sn is propping up the rewards. Is that coming from territory fees and if that eats all the fees should they be propping rewards up? Would not adding bulk to rewards save them sats and not need to rely on territory fees? Not sure. Love SN and if it’s the best way I’m all good with it