pull down to refresh

Bitcoin mining has proven crucial for the stability of Texas’s power grid, offering a more efficient alternative to traditional backup power plants.
Gas peaker plants are natural-gas-fired electricity plants that are needed only during peak electricity demand, and remain idle for the majority of the time. These plants are the main way of dealing with the high intermittency of renewable energy generation like solar and wind, but come with high setup and mainentance costs. For some time now, industry insiders have seen that coupling renewable energy generation with Bitcoin mining has helped stabilize electricity grids – we now have the data to back this up and show how Bitcoin mining obviates the need for gas peaker plants.
this territory is moderated
excellent article, 10 points to Gryffindor.
reply
Is this 18 billion per year or one time capital investment or expense?
The article doesn’t say
reply
$10 billion in buying Berkshire Hathaway's gas peaker plants that would
++ 8B
The estimated cost of gas peaker plants, which would be passed on to Texan power-users in the form of higher power bills, has now ballooned to $18 billion.
reply
18 billion is a capital expense
The two projects are not mutually exclusive. Texas can do both
reply
isn't it just one project?
reply
I mean they can mine bitcoin and buy the plants
But they chose not to buy the plants. Redundancy is a good idea
reply