> Have I mentioned I'm not a big ZH fan? It's because they often take something that already stands on its own as a problem and dress it in hyperbole

Fair enough.  I'm guilty of overreacting to some of their headlines for sure.

SimpleStacker

 and the fine print at the bottom of the ZH article, it sounds like it's 25%, not 100%. Since it's based on the deal Chicago gave them, I'm guessing it's potentially illegal (depending on court challenges), but sanctioned).

(Have I mentioned I'm not a big ZH fan? It's because they often take something that already stands on its own as a problem and dress it in hyperbole.)

Politics_And_Law

White Men Explicitly Excluded in Chicago Casino Share Offering

Clicking through the [link from the article](https://thetriibe.com/2025/01/chicagos-black-residents-can-invest-in-ballys-casino/) and the fine print at the bottom of the ZH article, it sounds like it's 25%, not 100%. Since it's based on the deal Chicago gave them, I'm guessing it's potentially illegal (depending on court challenges), but sanctioned).

(Have I mentioned I'm not a big ZH fan? It's because they often take something that already stands on its own as a problem and dress it in hyperbole.)