pull down to refresh
41 sats \ 1 reply \ @StillStackinAfterAllTheseYears 21 Jan \ on: White Men Explicitly Excluded in Chicago Casino Share Offering Politics_And_Law
Clicking through the link from the article and the fine print at the bottom of the ZH article, it sounds like it's 25%, not 100%. Since it's based on the deal Chicago gave them, I'm guessing it's potentially illegal (depending on court challenges), but sanctioned).
(Have I mentioned I'm not a big ZH fan? It's because they often take something that already stands on its own as a problem and dress it in hyperbole.)
Have I mentioned I'm not a big ZH fan? It's because they often take something that already stands on its own as a problem and dress it in hyperbole
Fair enough. I'm guilty of overreacting to some of their headlines for sure.
reply