That's interesting. Sounds like the implication is just that. An insinuation that there is no justifiable reason to do so.
I could imagine the next line of questioning would be, would you ever refuse a master account to someone because they do not have any personal association with a member of the Fed?
I appreciate your picks, unfortunately the YT link required signing into Google. So, happy to just get the gist.
That's interesting. Sounds like the implication is just that. An insinuation that there is no justifiable reason to do so.
I could imagine the next line of questioning would be, would you ever refuse a master account to someone because they do not have any personal association with a member of the Fed?
I appreciate your picks, unfortunately the YT link required signing into Google. So, happy to just get the gist.